DCH Ford of Eatontown
85 NJ-36
Eatontown, NJ 07724
732-982-4222

Compare the2025 Ford EscapeVS 2025 Nissan Murano

2025 Ford Escape
2025 Nissan Murano

Safety

In a Vehicle-to-Vehicle Frontal Crash Prevention 2.0 test conducted by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS), the Ford Escape achieved a “Acceptable” rating - the second highest possible - for its performance in forward collision warning and automatic braking systems, demonstrating its excellent capabilities in preventing collisions. The Nissan Murano has not been tested.

The Escape has standard Post-Collision Braking, which automatically apply the brakes in the event of a crash to help prevent secondary collisions and prevent further injuries. The Murano doesn’t offer a post collision braking system: in the event of a collision that triggers the airbags, more collisions are possible without the protection of airbags that may have already deployed.

Both the Escape and Murano have Rear Cross Traffic Alert, but the Escape has Rear Cross Traffic Braking (automatically applies the brakes) to better prevent a collision when backing near traffic. The Murano’s Rear Cross Traffic Alert doesn’t automatically brake.

Both the Escape and the Murano have standard driver and passenger frontal airbags, front side-impact airbags, driver knee airbags, side-impact head airbags, front and rear seatbelt pretensioners, front wheel drive, height adjustable front shoulder belts, four-wheel antilock brakes, traction control, electronic stability systems to prevent skidding, crash mitigating brakes, daytime running lights, lane departure warning systems, blind spot warning systems, rearview cameras, rear cross-path warning, driver alert monitors, available all wheel drive and around view monitors.

Warranty

There are almost 3 times as many Ford dealers as there are Nissan dealers, which makes it much easier should you ever need service under the Escape’s warranty.

Reliability

The Escape has a standard “limp home system” to keep drivers from being stranded if most or all of the engine’s coolant is lost. The engine will run on only half of its cylinders at a time, reduce its power and light a warning lamp on the dashboard so the driver can get to a service station for repairs. The Murano doesn’t offer a lost coolant limp home mode, so a coolant leak could strand you or seriously damage the truck’s engine.

Engine

The Escape’s optional 2.0 turbo 4-cylinder produces 9 more horsepower (250 vs. 241) and 20 lbs.-ft. more torque (280 vs. 260) than the Murano’s 2.0 turbo 4-cylinder.

Fuel Economy and Range

On the EPA test cycle the Escape gets better mileage than the Murano:

MPG

Escape

FWD

1.5 turbo 3-cyl.

27 city/34 hwy

AWD

1.5 turbo 3-cyl.

26 city/32 hwy

2.0 turbo 4-cyl.

23 city/31 hwy

Murano

FWD

2.0 turbo 4-cyl.

23 city/24 hwy

AWD

2.0 turbo 4-cyl.

23 city/24 hwy

An engine control system that can shut down some of the engine’s cylinders helps improve the Escape 1.5 Turbo’s fuel efficiency. The Murano doesn’t offer a system that can shut down part of the engine.

The Escape has a standard cap-less fueling system. The fuel filler is automatically opened when the fuel nozzle is inserted and automatically closed when it’s removed. This eliminates the need to unscrew and replace the cap and it reduces fuel evaporation, which causes pollution. The Murano doesn’t offer a cap-less fueling system.

Chassis

The Ford Escape may be more efficient, handle and accelerate better because it weighs about 900 pounds less than the Nissan Murano.

The Escape is 1 foot shorter than the Murano, making the Escape easier to handle, maneuver and park in tight spaces.

The front grille of the Escape uses electronically controlled shutters to close off airflow and reduce drag when less engine cooling is needed. This helps improve highway fuel economy. The Murano doesn’t offer active grille shutters.

Passenger Space

For enhanced passenger comfort on long trips the Escape’s rear seats recline. The Murano’s rear seats don’t recline.

Cargo Capacity

The Escape has a much larger cargo volume with its rear seat up than the Murano with its rear seat up (37.5 vs. 32.9 cubic feet). The Escape has a much larger cargo volume with its rear seat folded than the Murano with its rear seat folded (65.4 vs. 63.5 cubic feet).

A low lift-over cargo hatch design makes loading and unloading the Escape easier. The Escape’s cargo hatch lift-over height is 28.1 inches, while the Murano’s liftover is 31.6 inches.

Towing

The Escape’s standard towing capacity is much higher than the Murano’s (2000 vs. 1500 pounds). Maximum trailer towing in the Nissan Murano is only 1500 pounds. The Escape offers up to a 3500 lbs. towing capacity.

Standard Trailer Sway Control on the Escape uses the AdvanceTrac® sensors to detect trailer sway, then uses individual brakes to counteract any swaying and help keep the tow vehicle and trailer steady. The Murano doesn’t offer electronic trailer sway control.

Ergonomics

In case you lock your keys in your vehicle, or don’t have them with you, you can let yourself in using the Escape’s available exterior PIN entry system. The Murano doesn’t offer an exterior PIN entry system, and its NissanConnect Services can’t unlock the doors if the vehicle doesn’t have cell phone reception or the driver can’t contact the service.

Recommendations

Consumer Reports® recommends the Ford Escape, based on reliability, safety and performance.

The Ford Escape outsold the Nissan Murano by almost 8 to one during 2024.

DCH Ford of Eatontown | 85 NJ-36 Eatontown, NJ 07724 | 732-982-4222

© 1999 - 2026 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved.

Powered by Lithia